THE DEATHS OF 44 OF US FILIPINOS, A SYMPTOM OF AN UNDERLYING CAUSE

FOR WHOSE DEFENSE IS OUR DEFENSE SYSTEM TODAY?

The death of 44 of our brother filipinos is a symptom of a nation unable to control the direction its defense system is taking. We want to arrest a criminal in our land yet it is being protected by the MILF which is being protected by a foreign nation the malaysians which is being protected by the british. The british conducted persuasion flights above our territory at the height of our dispute with the malaysians because of our efforts to recover our North Borneo from their occupation.  A trespassing which is in conflict with the U.S. claim that they will protect the Philippines. Why then are we filipinos unable to control the direction of our defense?

FOR WHOSE DEFENSE ARE THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF OUR NATION DIRECTING THEIR ACTIONS?

We say it is because it is being directed by Pres Aquino who was elected in an institution called election process. But Aquino is a Cojuangco, among the chinese who have conducted creeping invasion of our nation. They are the chinese against whom one of the founding fathers of our nation Jose Rizal was defending our nation.  Gen Ricarte prepared a position paper which stated that chinese should be banned from business and banking.

A document was shown Jose Rizal to which he drew attention to the fact that he was incorrectly described as a chinese mestizo, saying that he was an "indio puro." Rizal further declared: “I do not agree. This is unjust! Here it says that I am a half-breed, and it isn’t true! I am a pure Filipino!” In a letter to his mother, Jose Rizal wrote: “I had a lawsuit with the Chinese and I vowed not to buy any more from them, so that sometimes I find myself very hard up. Now we have almost neither dishes nor tumblers.” Edgar Wickberg, who wrote "The Chinese in Philippine Life 1850-1898" said that in 1895, while in exile in Dapitan in Mindanao, in the southern Philippines, Jose Rizal was filled with righteous indignation at the “exploitation” of the natives by the Chinese traders, and appealed to the local residents to boycott the Chinese shops. He also opened a small sari-sari store to compete against the Chinese. Nick Joaquin, the late Philippine cultural icon, even praised Rizal’s actions: “And because Chinese financiers had a stranglehold on native agriculture, Rizal set up the Cooperative Association of Dapitan Farmers, a pioneer in economic nationalism.

DEVIATION FROM NATIONALISM TO ALIENISM

They are the creeping invaders whose control of our nation we filipinos have tried to check in the early 1900s. But the U.S. established institutions like laws, Philippine Constabulary law enforcers, and political leaders who were already corrupted into providing legitimate conduits of U.S. interest policy implementors. So our efforts to check chinese invasion and controls where blocked.

As their penetration of our economic, political, defense, and education system deepened, their legitimacy of control of our institutions further strengthened. While as our hold of our economic, political, defense, and education system, weakened, our dependency towards the chinese and the U.S. further become an institution and a paradigm.

SACRIFICIAL OFFERINGS TO THE ALIEN GODS

Today, while lives of us filipinos are mere offerings to please the nations the chinese president of the Philippines is serving, we filipinos fight each other to determine which among our actions and laws failed to implement with the least scandal and with finese, the policies and interests of these foreign legitimated and already institutionalized owners of our nation.  What we now have is a defense system for the interest of the chinese, malaysians, north americans of the US, and the british.

RECOVER OUR INHERITANCE

Only when we recover our inheritance of nationalism in the DNA of the fathers of our nation including that of Jose Rizal as well as Gen Antonio Luna, can we have genuine defense that is for the interest of us filipinos.

WHAT IS THE STATUS OF OUR DEFENSE SYSTEM AS A FUNCTION TO DEFEND US AGAINST FOREIGN INVADERS?

CAN IT DEFEND OUR SOVEREIGNTY AND CONTROL OVER OUR RESOURCES AND OUR DESTINY?

About the logic of our claim to our peripheral territories when we filipinos here on our very main home archipelago are even losing our access and control of our economic resources and system to the chinese; when we are losing our real estate properties to the chinese; when due to economic displacement of our farmers, businessmen, retailers, and employees on contractual, by the business actions of the chinese, our population of highly skilled and capable moving out of our country for economic sustenance are ever increasing by the year, while the chinese strength in the Philippines are ever increasing by the year; when our organic defense system which was conceived with nationalism, independence, and adaptability by the founding fathers of our nation and carried on as our inherited DNA by Gen Antonio Luna was dismantled and replaced by U.S. synthesized DNA have been developed in the direction of perpetual potency against brother filipinos but perpetual impotency in external defense and dependency towards U.S. since mid 1900s till today; when the mass of filipinos among us are losing our legitimacy status towards our ownership and control of our nation while the chinese and other foreigners are gaining legitimacy status in ownership and control of our nation; when control of direction of our development of our economic, legislative, political, defense and educational systems here in our main home archipelago are already in the hands of the chinese and north americans of the United States.

BEFORE CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH FOREIGNERS, WHOSE INTEREST DOES OUR DEFENSE SYSTEM DEFEND?

About our combat capability based on our prevailing: concept of our nationhood and national identity; demographic and psychological social cohesiveness and unity; level of nationalism and independence.  If the strength of our military force is the same as that of China yet our nation is controlled by the chinese, how would the direction of development of our defense system be?  If the strength of our military force is that of the U.S.A. yet the direction of development of our systems of politics, and defense is controlled by the U.S., where would the direction of development of such systems be?  How would the direction of development of our security and foreign affairs be?  Whose interests would it defend?  The best that could happen is that we filipinos adjust our interest with that of the chinese and or the north americans of the United States perpetually and always balancing between the two.

Some representative answers can be found in: the way Pres Cory Aquino, a chinese oriented person and a representative of chinese control of our nation, handled our Sabah Claim which she handed over to the Malaysians; the way Pres Noynoy, the son of Pres Cory handled our internal Mindanao affairs which he collaborated with the malaysians; the perpetual orientation of our defense system towards internal security, which was the original concept of the U.S. occupational forces in establishing the Philippine Constabulary, and the Philippine Scouts, and the eventual development of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

An individual person is highly skilled in combat with a powerful strength and endurance.  However, the DNA of the cells of its immune system has been invaded by the HIVirus and has developed AIDS thru the years.  How can that person be effective in defending himself?

A nation has a strong defense system.  However, it’s very Determinant of National Actions, the developmental dynamics within, that has been carrying the inherited national identity based on which is the instruction for the direction of development of the economic, defense, political system and educational system of the nation every generation, has been invaded by the chinese and the north americans of the United States.  They have taken over control of what was supposed to be our inherited code.  Our inherited DNA has been injured.  We have aquired an Alienation Impotency Dependency Syndrome.  How then can we be effective in defending our own nation?

The answer to this is the first step towards the direction of an effective defense system.

 


Jose Miguel Garcia

PRESENTING:

 

                                                       
Do we want to experience travelling as a family?  Do we want to experience travelling as a filipino family?  Do we want to experience travelling not only to a distant place but also to a distant past of a nation along it's nationhood? 

If we do, but cannot physically leave our home, office, or the place where we are at present because of some pressing matter that is holding us, well there is this relatively new website that can provide us with such experiences just mentioned.  It is this website, "La Familia Viajera."  Let us check on this site via: http://www.lafamiliaviajera.com/ 



Jose Miguel Garcia

PILIPINAS VS FILIPINAS

The following is the report by The Commission on the Filipino Language (Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino) on the relationship of the use of the term 'Filipinas' to the recovery of unity of the whole nation as based on history, logic and the constitution.  Following the report is an observation regarding the report.  To read the whole and original of the aforementioned report from inquirer.net, click the next group of extracts:   
      
" BUWAN NG WIKA

From ‘Pilipinas’ to ‘Filipinas’

By The Commission on the Filipino Language (Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino)

11:39 pm | Saturday, August 17th, 2013

 

“HIBIK ng Filipinas” is the poem by Katipunan Supremo Andres Bonifacio, an example of the use of Filipinas to refer to the country. Bonifacio led the Philippine Revolution against Spain in 1896.
“ANG PAGSASARILI” is a brand of cigarette in the 1920s during the American period, another example of the use of Filipinas to refer to the country while struggling for independence.
Photos courtesy of The Commission on the Filipino Language

 
1 WHY go back to “Filipinas?”

There are three reasons behind the Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 13-19 (April 12, 2012) of the Commission on the Filipino Language or Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino (KWF):

First, history. There are now three forms of the name of our country.

Filipinas, the name given by Ruy López de Villalobos in 1548 and used officially by Miguel López de Legazpi when he established the Spanish colony beginning 1565, which was used continuously for 300 years until the time of Rizal and Bonifacio, and again used as the name of the first Asian republic—the “Republica Filipinas” established in Malolos in 1898.

“Philippines,” the name used by the Americans when they entered our country in 1898 and officially used by the Constitution of 1936 and up to the current Constitution of 1987.

“Pilipinas,” used starting around 1941 when the abakada without the F was promoted for general usage and continued as the translation of Filipinas and Philippines in works and documents written in the Pilipino language (which was the name given in 1959 to the national language using the abakada).

Second, language change and development. In the 1973 Constitution,  it was stated that “Filipino” instead of Pilipino should be the name of the national language.

This was restated in the 1987 Constitution, together with the proposed modernization and enrichment of the national language by way of the native languages.

The first step in this language change was the eschewing of the abakada and the promotion and spread of the alpabeto with the additional letters C, F, J, Ñ, Q, V, X and Z.

Now that the national language has an F and is called Filipino, isn’t it simply logical to restore Filipinas and gradually  discourage the use of Pilipinas?

Third, to be consistent with the method of using the eight additional letters in the Ortograpiyang Pambansa (National Orthography) being promoted by the KWF.

This is the first comprehensive examination of the new alphabet and should be read closely by users of the the Filipino language and other native languages.

The case of Filipinas is ...

 ... it is also a symbol of the linkage and union of the barangay, tribes and islands of our archipelago.

Before Filipinas, what Legazpi referred to as Indios were a disjointed, scattered lot. He colonized us but also gave us a first means toward national unity.

On the other hand, it is rather difficult to say that just calling our country Pilipinas is already nationalistic. This happened merely because of ...

... with the eight additional Filipino letters is reflective of the aim to include and involve the native languages of the country,... "

Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/59035/from-pilipinas-to-filipinas

                    

The succeeding report is an observation regarding the preceeding report.  This is based on the developmental intercourse of our nation as the basis for our nationhood.

If we reject the way our founding fathers pronounced our nation, we reject the way they acted towards our nation as a result of their development.  If we reject their action towards our nation as a result of their development, we reject their development.  If we reject their development, we do not anymore recognize them but somebody else.  Since these somebody else are not the ones who came into existense thru our historical development, these so called founding fathers are not anymore real but synthetics.  Therefore, if the founding fathers of our nation we recognize are already synthetics, the nation we recognize today as founded by synthetic founding fathers is also synthetic.  If the nation we recognize today is synthetic, what kind of people of this nation do we have today then?

If the nation we recognize today is synthetic, how can we have love for it?  If the nation we recognize today is already synthetic, how can it produce a people that is organic the way our nation of the 1900s was founded by our organic founding fathers?  How then can we have bond with our real founding fathers?  And how then can we have bond for a people already a product of a nation founded by people who are already synthetic?  The only bond we have then is only thru a piece of paper.  With only a piece of paper devoid of flesh and blood developed thru history, how can a bond with a people that is part of our Determinant of National Actions directing us for generations, be ever formed?  Without it, how can we have a functioning social order such as that of an organic nation?

How then, can we have a nation with people acting cohesively for the life of our nation and  not individually to the detriment of such nation?  What we have been experiencing after the mid 1900s are the abandonment of the nation for the pleasure of the self and family.  This was the time our developmental defenses against the north americans of the United States invaders have finally been dismantled.  This was the time our developmental defenses against the chinese creeping invaders of our economy have finally been dismantled as a result of U.S. blocking of our efforts to wrest control of it from them.  It was then that our Determinant of National Actions in our political, economic, defense, and educational systems have been severely corrupted by these foreigners who have taken over control of direction of development of those systems.

Is it still a wonder that after the mid 1900s until today, our archipelago has become the breeding place for corruption, littering of wastes, taking advantage of the weaker by the stronger, destruction of our mountains and forests, mass exile to foreign lands, all legitimized for individual and family survival?  Is it still a wonder that those among us who act to correct the deviation that occured along our organic development to recover the nation we inherited from our founding fathers in the form of recovering our clean environment, our original forest lands, our real independence, our original resources, our sovereignty, and our original DNA are identified as the ones who are deviants?

If we are to recover from a corrupted DNA of a people that we are today, let us recover that love of nation we had as a people united in the 1900s.  If we are to recover that love of nation we had as a people united and determined at the cost of our individual and family life in the 1900s, let us recover that development of the founding fathers of our nation that directed them to act towards our nation the way they did.   

Jose Miguel Garcia